Federal Agricultural Mortgage vs Regional Management
AGM and RM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGM and RM compare
Federal Agricultural Mortgage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.1% versus 8.4% for Regional Management).
Federal Agricultural Mortgage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 51.0% compared with 7.0% at Regional Management.
Regional Management pays a dividend yielding 3.4%; Federal Agricultural Mortgage does not pay one.
Regional Management scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Federal Agricultural Mortgage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGM | RM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $316M |
| Share price | $174.10 | $35.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.9% | −8.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.6% | −42.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 212 | 2,112 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.1× |
| P/S | – | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 3.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 1.0× |
| FCF yield | – | 101% |
| Fair value | – | $50.04 |
| Margin of safety | – | 29.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.1% (better) | 8.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.8% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.3% | 14.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.6% | 19.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.6% (better) | 13.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 51.0% (better) | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | – | 46.7% |
| Return on equity | 13.5% (better) | 12.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 19.36 (better) | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 0.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.4% | 43.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 9.6% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 13.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.9% | 91.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 17.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$12.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- AGM stock overview
- AGM income statement
- AGM valuation and score
- RM stock overview
- RM income statement
- RM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.