Advantage Solutions vs RB Global
ADV and RBA side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADV and RBA compare
RB Global is the larger company, worth 45 times as much as Advantage Solutions ($17.6B against $391M).
RB Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.1% versus 2.9% for Advantage Solutions).
RB Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.5% compared with −8.9% at Advantage Solutions.
RB Global pays a dividend yielding 0.67%; Advantage Solutions does not pay one.
RB Global scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Advantage Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADV | RBA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $391M | $17.6B |
| Share price | $30.51 | $95.15 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.1% | −6.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −84.4% | 30.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 0.51 |
| Employees | 73K | 8,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 36.6× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | – | 3.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 32.2× | 15.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 3.7× (better) | 28.5× |
| FCF yield | 26.8% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $150.28 | $92.41 |
| Margin of safety | 79.7% (better) | −3.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.9% | 11.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | 27.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 21.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 24.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −4.1% | 16.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −8.9% | 10.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.9% | 12.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 9.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.60 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 25.22 | 1.97 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −1.0× | 4.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.81 (better) | 1.31 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.16 | 2.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.67% |
| Buyback yield | 4.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.67% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 32.5% | 98.3% |
| Held by insiders | 68.3% | 0.26% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $368K (better) | −$2.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.0% | 9.9% |
Go deeper
- ADV stock overview
- ADV income statement
- ADV valuation and score
- RBA stock overview
- RBA income statement
- RBA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.