Array Digital Infrastructure vs Shenandoah Telecommunications
AD and SHEN side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AD and SHEN compare
Array Digital Infrastructure is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as Shenandoah Telecommunications ($2.4B against $563M).
Array Digital Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.1% versus 5.5% for Shenandoah Telecommunications).
Array Digital Infrastructure keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 292% compared with −10.2% at Shenandoah Telecommunications.
Both pay dividends: Array Digital Infrastructure yields 76.3% and Shenandoah Telecommunications 1.2%.
Array Digital Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Shenandoah Telecommunications), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AD | SHEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $563M |
| Share price | $27.84 | $10.17 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.9% | −5.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.8% | −62.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 60 | 1,041 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.7× | – |
| P/S | 10.9× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× (better) | 11.2× |
| PEG | 0.22 | – |
| FCF yield | −17.7% (better) | −38.5% |
| Fair value | $95.30 | $13.58 |
| Margin of safety | 70.8% (better) | 25.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 71.1% (better) | 5.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −47.4% | 10.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3961% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4039% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −26.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.6% | 65.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 257% (better) | −3.9% |
| Net margin | 292% (better) | −10.2% |
| FCF margin | −194% | −58.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 33.3% (better) | −4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.4% (better) | −0.76% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.50 (better) | 0.88 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.72 (better) | 6.29 |
| Interest coverage | 13.8× (better) | −0.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.11 (better) | 0.71 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.23 (better) | 0.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 76.3% (better) | 1.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −20.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 76.3% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.7% | 71.6% |
| Held by insiders | – | 24.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$261K | $94.1K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- AD stock overview
- AD income statement
- AD valuation and score
- SHEN stock overview
- SHEN income statement
- SHEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.