StockData

Enact vs Crawford

ACT and CRD.A side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ACT and CRD.A compare

Enact is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Crawford ($6.3B against $581M).

Enact grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus −3.6% for Crawford).

Both pay dividends: Enact yields 2.0% and Crawford 2.6%.

Crawford scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Enact), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricACTCRD.A
Size and price
Market cap$6.3B$581M
Share price$45.83$11.95
Change, 1 year21.8%5.1%
Change, 5 years99.1%49.4%
Beta (5Y)0.510.81
Employees4199,943
StockData Score
Total score611 (better)
Valuation score4 (better)2
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score13 (better)
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score13 (better)
Valuation
P/E9.5×–
P/S5.0×0.4× (better)
P/B1.2× (better)3.1×
EV/EBITDA–7.8×
P/FCF–8.1×
PEG5.97–
FCF yield–12.4%
Fair value$97.89–
Margin of safety53.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.5% (better)−3.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.2%5.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−19.9%
EPS growth (TTM)10.6%–
EPS growth, 5Y average14.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin–28.2%
Net margin–2.0%
FCF margin–5.5%
Return on equity–14.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity–1.21
Net debt / EBITDA–1.57
Current ratio–1.17
Altman Z-score3.40 (better)2.80
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield2.0%2.6% (better)
Payout ratio–56.7%
Years of dividend growth1–
Buyback yield6.8% (better)5.2%
Shareholder yield8.8% (better)7.7%
Ownership
Held by institutions21.7%36.9%
Held by insiders90.6%26.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$329M−$15.2M (better)
Short interest, % of float23.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.