Arch Capital vs Everest
ACGL and EG side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACGL and EG compare
Arch Capital is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Everest ($37.4B against $15.8B).
On earnings, Arch Capital is cheaper: it trades at 9.0× trailing earnings, against 9.0× for Everest.
Arch Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.9% versus −8.7% for Everest).
Arch Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.3% compared with 11.7% at Everest.
Everest pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Arch Capital does not pay one.
Everest scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Arch Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACGL | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $37.4B | $15.8B |
| Share price | $109.61 | $427.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.4% | 31.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 161% | 59.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 8,000 | 3,064 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.0× (better) | 9.0× |
| P/S | 2.0× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 6.6× | – |
| PEG | 0.20 (better) | 0.25 |
| FCF yield | 15.0% | – |
| Fair value | $114.13 | $595.20 |
| Margin of safety | 4.0% | 28.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.9% (better) | −8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.6% (better) | 12.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 243% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 14.5% | 256% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.4% (better) | 24.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 23.3% (better) | 11.7% |
| FCF margin | 30.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 18.7% (better) | 12.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 1.09 (better) | 0.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 16.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.2% |
| Buyback yield | 11.2% (better) | 10.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 11.2% | 11.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.6% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 5.5% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.0M | −$3.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- ACGL stock overview
- ACGL income statement
- ACGL valuation and score
- EG stock overview
- EG income statement
- EG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.