StockData

Ambev vs Archer-Daniels-Midland

ABEV and ADM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ABEV and ADM compare

Archer-Daniels-Midland grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.82% versus −1.4% for Ambev).

Ambev keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.6% compared with 2.2% at Archer-Daniels-Midland.

Archer-Daniels-Midland pays a dividend yielding 2.9%; Ambev does not pay one.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricABEVADM
Size and price
Market cap–$34.2B
Share price$2.73$70.97
Change, 1 year7.9%23.1%
Change, 5 years−10.8%8.6%
Beta (5Y)0.410.43
Employees40K41K
StockData Score
Total score1212
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score6 (better)0
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score04 (better)
Valuation
P/E–19.4×
P/S–0.4×
EV/EBITDA–10.6×
P/FCF–20.4×
FCF yield–4.9%
Fair value–$72.39
Margin of safety–2.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.4%−0.82% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average8.6% (better)4.5%
Net income growth (TTM)7.4%61.1% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)8.3%60.1% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average6.6% (better)−6.7%
Profitability
Gross margin51.4% (better)6.9%
Operating margin26.4%–
Net margin17.6% (better)2.2%
FCF margin22.5% (better)2.0%
Return on equity16.6%–
Return on invested capital25.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.04–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.651.79 (better)
Interest coverage5.3×–
Current ratio0.961.39 (better)
Altman Z-score–2.99
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–2.9%
Payout ratio–56.6%
Years of dividend growth–15
Dividend growth, 5Y average–7.2%
Shareholder yield–2.9%
Ownership
Held by institutions8.9%87.5%
Held by insiders0.22%0.75%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.6M (better)−$8.9M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float–2.6%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.