Vishay Precision vs Vishay Intertechnology
VPG and VSH side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How VPG and VSH compare
Vishay Intertechnology is the larger company, worth 6.0 times as much as Vishay Precision ($4.1B against $678M).
Vishay Intertechnology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.6% versus 11.6% for Vishay Precision).
Vishay Intertechnology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.7% compared with −1.0% at Vishay Precision.
Vishay Intertechnology pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; Vishay Precision does not pay one.
Vishay Intertechnology scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Vishay Precision), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | VPG | VSH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $678M | $4.1B |
| Share price | $50.90 | $26.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 51.7% | 87.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.6% | 23.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 2,100 | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 42.9× |
| P/S | 2.0× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.2× | 8.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 462× | 35.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.22% | 2.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $27.56 | $26.98 |
| Margin of safety | −84.7% | 1.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.6% | 17.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −142% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −142% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −12.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.7% (better) | 22.5% |
| Operating margin | 1.1% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.0% | 2.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.44% | 3.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.00% | 3.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.70% | 4.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.05 (better) | 0.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −3.21 | −0.98 |
| Interest coverage | 2.8× | 5.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.59 (better) | 3.31 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.95 (better) | 2.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.3% | 99.4% |
| Held by insiders | 3.9% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$594K |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.3% | 10.5% |
Go deeper
- VPG stock overview
- VPG income statement
- VPG valuation and score
- VSH stock overview
- VSH income statement
- VSH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.