Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS vs Verizon Communications
TKC and VZ side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TKC and VZ compare
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.7% versus 1.4% for Verizon Communications).
Verizon Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.8% compared with 7.3% at Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS.
Verizon Communications pays a dividend yielding 6.0%; Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS does not pay one.
Verizon Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TKC | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $193B |
| Share price | $4.78 | $46.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −17.4% | 16.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 17.4% | −8.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.51 | 0.24 |
| Employees | 18K | 90K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.9× |
| P/S | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.3× |
| Fair value | – | $58.03 |
| Margin of safety | – | 19.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.7% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.3% (better) | 1.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −42.8% | −17.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −42.8% | −16.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 30.9% (better) | −1.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 15.9% | 20.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.3% | 11.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 21.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 7.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 7.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.61 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.65 (better) | 3.33 |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | 3.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.70 (better) | 0.63 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 6.0% |
| Payout ratio | 51.0% | 71.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 6.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.2% | 69.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$16.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- TKC stock overview
- TKC income statement
- TKC valuation and score
- VZ stock overview
- VZ income statement
- VZ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.