AT&T vs Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS
T and TKC side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How T and TKC compare
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.7% versus 3.5% for AT&T).
AT&T keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.2% compared with 7.3% at Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS.
AT&T pays a dividend yielding 5.0%; Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS does not pay one.
AT&T scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | T | TKC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $150B | – |
| Share price | $22.26 | $4.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.4% | −17.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −7.7% | 17.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.32 | 0.51 |
| Employees | 133K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.0× | – |
| P/S | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.9% | – |
| Fair value | $26.07 | – |
| Margin of safety | 14.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% | 10.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.6% | 28.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −41.0% (better) | −42.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −39.9% (better) | −42.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 30.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 28.3% |
| Operating margin | 18.3% (better) | 15.9% |
| Net margin | 10.2% (better) | 7.3% |
| FCF margin | 13.8% | 21.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 7.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.61 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.41 | 0.65 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.2× (better) | 1.7× |
| Current ratio | 0.87 | 1.70 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.78 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 60.4% | 51.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −11.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 11.2% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 68.1% | 1.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.11% | 0.00% |
Go deeper
- T stock overview
- T income statement
- T valuation and score
- TKC stock overview
- TKC income statement
- TKC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.