StockData

Silynxcom vs Wrap Technologies

SYNX and WRAP side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How SYNX and WRAP compare

Wrap Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (87.3% versus −36.2% for Silynxcom).

Wrap Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 1 for Silynxcom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricSYNXWRAP
Size and price
Market cap–$71.1M
Share price$0.825$1.27
Change, 1 year−43.1%−40.7%
Change, 5 years–−76.6%
Beta (5Y)1.201.90
Employees3625
StockData Score
Total score19 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–11.7×
P/B–5.3×
FCF yield–−12.7%
Fair value–$0.962
Margin of safety–−32.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−36.2%87.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–3.4%
Profitability
Gross margin36.3%63.6% (better)
Operating margin−52.2% (better)−227%
Net margin–−223%
FCF margin−46.4% (better)−150%
Return on equity–−108%
Return on invested capital–−134%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−29.2×–
Current ratio3.118.04 (better)
Altman Z-score–8.48
Piotroski F-score–5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–10.3%
Held by insiders54.6%57.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$157K (better)−$344K
Short interest, % of float0.24%32.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.