Swvl vs Ucommune International
SWVL and UK side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SWVL and UK compare
Swvl grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.5% versus −66.2% for Ucommune International).
Ucommune International scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Swvl), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SWVL | UK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $4.58 | $1.52 |
| Change, 1 year | 50.3% | −82.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.2% | −99.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 10K | 42 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 40.5% (better) | −66.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.0% (better) | −50.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.0% (better) | −2.9% |
| Operating margin | −2.0% (better) | −155% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | – |
| FCF margin | −8.9% (better) | −80.8% |
| Return on equity | 29.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −44.1% | −31.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −2.7× | – |
| Current ratio | – | 1.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 75.4% | 0.00% |
Go deeper
- SWVL stock overview
- SWVL income statement
- SWVL valuation and score
- UK stock overview
- UK income statement
- UK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.