ONE Group Hospitality vs Wingstop
STKS and WING side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How STKS and WING compare
Wingstop is the larger company, worth 122 times as much as ONE Group Hospitality ($4.3B against $35.2M).
Wingstop grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.9% versus −2.8% for ONE Group Hospitality).
Wingstop keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.0% compared with −2.7% at ONE Group Hospitality.
Wingstop pays a dividend yielding 0.98%; ONE Group Hospitality does not pay one.
Wingstop scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 3 for ONE Group Hospitality), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | STKS | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $35.2M | $4.3B |
| Share price | $1.11 | $158.86 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.3% | −34.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.3% | −10.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 118 | 1,367 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 37.3× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 5.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× (better) | 23.3× |
| P/FCF | 5.1× (better) | 36.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.72 |
| FCF yield | 19.4% (better) | 2.7% |
| Fair value | – | $203.22 |
| Margin of safety | – | 21.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.8% | 6.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 41.5% (better) | 22.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −32.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −30.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 51.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 86.1% |
| Operating margin | 2.4% | 27.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.7% | 16.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.86% | 16.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.1% | 51.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.31 | 4.77 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.32 | 2.12 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.71 | 2.39 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.98% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −27.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.0% | 125% |
| Held by insiders | 41.0% | 0.72% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $39.2K (better) | −$1.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.1% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- STKS stock overview
- STKS income statement
- STKS valuation and score
- WING stock overview
- WING income statement
- WING valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.