SiriusPoint vs White Mountains Insurance
SPNT and WTM side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SPNT and WTM compare
White Mountains Insurance is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as SiriusPoint ($5.4B against $3.1B).
On earnings, White Mountains Insurance is cheaper: it trades at 6.0× trailing earnings, against 6.7× for SiriusPoint.
White Mountains Insurance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.9% versus 18.1% for SiriusPoint).
White Mountains Insurance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.9% compared with 14.9% at SiriusPoint.
White Mountains Insurance pays a dividend yielding 0.04%; SiriusPoint does not pay one.
White Mountains Insurance scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for SiriusPoint), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SPNT | WTM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $26.57 | $2254.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.1% | 16.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 212% | 114% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 0.24 |
| Employees | 1,072 | 1,648 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.7× | 6.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.38 |
| Fair value | $31.36 | $3223.04 |
| Margin of safety | 15.3% | 30.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.1% | 44.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 29.2% | 33.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 153% | 591% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 147% | 596% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.9% (better) | 13.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 92.8% |
| Net margin | 14.9% | 26.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.6% (better) | 19.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.61 | 1.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.04% |
| Payout ratio | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 3.3% | 7.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.3% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.9% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 60.9% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$20.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.6% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- SPNT stock overview
- SPNT income statement
- SPNT valuation and score
- WTM stock overview
- WTM income statement
- WTM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.