Senstar Technologies vs UTStarcom
SNT and UTSI side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SNT and UTSI compare
Senstar Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.7% versus −17.5% for UTStarcom).
Senstar Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for UTStarcom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SNT | UTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.96 | $1.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −58.7% | −21.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −48.6% | −58.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 132 | 238 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% (better) | −17.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −18.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 22.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 27.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.5% (better) | 11.7% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% (better) | −95.3% |
| Net margin | 8.8% | – |
| FCF margin | 3.3% (better) | −103% |
| Return on equity | 8.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.8% (better) | −432% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 4.52 (better) | 2.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.0% | – |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.80% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$82.4K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.09% | 0.02% |
Go deeper
- SNT stock overview
- SNT income statement
- SNT valuation and score
- UTSI stock overview
- UTSI income statement
- UTSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.