Security National Financial vs Walker & Dunlop
SNFCA and WD side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SNFCA and WD compare
Walker & Dunlop is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Security National Financial ($1.3B against $246M).
Walker & Dunlop grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.87% versus −4.2% for Security National Financial).
Security National Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.0% compared with −2.6% at Walker & Dunlop.
Walker & Dunlop pays a dividend yielding 7.1%; Security National Financial does not pay one.
Security National Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Walker & Dunlop), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SNFCA | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $246M | $1.3B |
| Share price | $9.00 | $38.30 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.0% | −42.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 12.4% | −74.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 1,243 | 1,466 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.7× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/FCF | 2.2× | 0.9× (better) |
| PEG | 1.92 | – |
| FCF yield | 44.8% | 117% (better) |
| Fair value | $13.59 | $79.95 |
| Margin of safety | 33.8% | 52.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.2% | 0.87% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.5% | 2.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.7% (better) | −128% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.5% (better) | −130% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −14.4% (better) | −26.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 98.6% | – |
| Net margin | 9.0% (better) | −2.6% |
| FCF margin | 33.8% | 123% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.8% (better) | −1.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.55 | 0.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.55% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.55% | 8.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 34.3% | 86.7% |
| Held by insiders | 3.7% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$94.5K | $990K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.82% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- SNFCA stock overview
- SNFCA income statement
- SNFCA valuation and score
- WD stock overview
- WD income statement
- WD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.