SharkNinja vs Viomi Technology
SN and VIOT side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SN and VIOT compare
SharkNinja scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Viomi Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SN | VIOT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $226.39 | $1.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 141% | −49.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −67.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 1.07 |
| Employees | 4,143 | 271 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 14.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −16.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 116% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −3.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.4% (better) | 25.3% |
| Operating margin | 15.6% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net margin | 11.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 7.0% (better) | 4.7% |
| Return on equity | 33.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 30.8% (better) | 17.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 | 0.08 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.17 (better) | −3.58 |
| Current ratio | 2.04 | 2.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 65.0% | 1.1% |
| Held by insiders | 41.2% | 17.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$634M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.6% | – |
Go deeper
- SN stock overview
- SN income statement
- SN valuation and score
- VIOT stock overview
- VIOT income statement
- VIOT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.