Sweetgreen vs Wingstop
SG and WING side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SG and WING compare
Wingstop is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Sweetgreen ($4.5B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Wingstop is cheaper: it trades at 39.1× trailing earnings, against 85.9× for Sweetgreen.
Wingstop grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.9% versus 0.03% for Sweetgreen).
Wingstop keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.0% compared with 2.8% at Sweetgreen.
Wingstop pays a dividend yielding 0.74%; Sweetgreen does not pay one.
Wingstop scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Sweetgreen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SG | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $4.5B |
| Share price | $12.88 | $166.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 137% | −29.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −75.7% | −5.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.67 | 1.34 |
| Employees | 6,486 | 1,367 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 85.9× | 39.1× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 6.2× |
| P/B | 3.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 24.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 38.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.75 |
| FCF yield | −6.6% | 2.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.57 | $203.22 |
| Margin of safety | −131% | 18.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.03% | 6.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.2% (better) | 22.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −32.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −30.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 51.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.1% | 86.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −20.7% | 27.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 16.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −14.8% | 16.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −45.1% | 51.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.77 |
| Interest coverage | −1323.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.27 | 2.12 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.97 | 2.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −27.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.7% | 125% |
| Held by insiders | 12.2% | 0.72% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $3.0M (better) | −$1.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 20.9% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- SG stock overview
- SG income statement
- SG valuation and score
- WING stock overview
- WING income statement
- WING valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.