RingCentral vs TaskUs
RNG and TASK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RNG and TASK compare
RingCentral is the larger company, worth 7.5 times as much as TaskUs ($6.3B against $841M).
On earnings, TaskUs is cheaper: it trades at 8.3× trailing earnings, against 9.9× for RingCentral.
TaskUs grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.6% versus 5.5% for RingCentral).
RingCentral keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.3% compared with 8.2% at TaskUs.
Both pay dividends: RingCentral yields 0.37% and TaskUs 39.8%.
TaskUs scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 13 for RingCentral), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RNG | TASK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.3B | $841M |
| Share price | $75.10 | $9.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 177% | −24.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −67.3% | −81.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.85 | 1.84 |
| Employees | 7,378 | 38K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.9× | 8.3× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | – | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.1× | 8.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.5× | 8.4× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.20 |
| FCF yield | 10.5% | 12.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $129.77 | $21.91 |
| Margin of safety | 42.1% | 58.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 8.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.3% | 19.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4905% (better) | 25.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5300% (better) | 23.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 23.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 72.2% (better) | 35.3% |
| Operating margin | 7.5% | 11.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 25.3% (better) | 8.2% |
| FCF margin | 25.5% (better) | 8.1% |
| Return on equity | – | 23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.8% (better) | 17.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.51 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.13 | 2.09 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.1× | 5.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 2.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.21 (better) | 2.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.37% | 39.8% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 5.2% (better) | −0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% | 39.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 30.5% |
| Held by insiders | 6.2% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$21.2M | −$463K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.2% | – |
Go deeper
- RNG stock overview
- RNG income statement
- RNG valuation and score
- TASK stock overview
- TASK income statement
- TASK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.