Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory vs Tootsie Roll Industries
RMCF and TR side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RMCF and TR compare
Tootsie Roll Industries is the larger company, worth 386 times as much as Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory ($2.9B against $7.5M).
Tootsie Roll Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.20% versus −9.7% for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory).
Tootsie Roll Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.4% compared with −22.3% at Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory.
Tootsie Roll Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.92%; Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory does not pay one.
Tootsie Roll Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RMCF | TR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.5M | $2.9B |
| Share price | $0.782 | $38.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.5% | 4.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −91.6% | 39.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.42 | 0.27 |
| Employees | 160 | 2,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 33.3× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 53.8× |
| FCF yield | −36.8% | 1.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.46 | $26.06 |
| Margin of safety | 46.6% (better) | −48.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.7% | 0.20% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 9.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −11.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.8% | 33.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −18.7% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −22.3% | 11.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −10.2% | 7.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −132% | 8.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −117% | 7.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −5.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 2.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.50 | 6.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | – | 32.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.92% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 8.1% | 17.1% |
| Held by insiders | 59.0% | 59.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$658K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | – |
Go deeper
- RMCF stock overview
- RMCF income statement
- RMCF valuation and score
- TR stock overview
- TR income statement
- TR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.