StockData

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals vs Teva Pharmaceutical Industries

REGN and TEVA side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How REGN and TEVA compare

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Teva Pharmaceutical Industries ($99.2B against $49.4B).

On earnings, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is cheaper: it trades at 21.2× trailing earnings, against 70.7× for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.6% versus −15.2% for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries).

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.5% compared with 5.0% at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals pays a dividend yielding 0.39%; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries does not pay one.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricREGNTEVA
Size and price
Market cap$99.2B$49.4B
Share price$959.41$42.40
Change, 1 year46.5%76.9%
Change, 5 years47.0%377%
Beta (5Y)0.620.98
Employees15K34K
StockData Score
Total score16 (better)7
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score44
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score3 (better)0
Valuation
P/E21.2× (better)70.7×
P/S5.9×3.5× (better)
P/B3.0× (better)6.4×
EV/EBITDA17.1× (better)19.4×
P/FCF25.9× (better)36.7×
PEG7.66–
FCF yield3.9% (better)2.7%
Fair value$890.93$19.87
Margin of safety−7.7% (better)−113%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)18.6% (better)−15.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average11.0% (better)0.71%
Net income growth (TTM)5.2%–
EPS growth (TTM)8.4%–
EPS growth, 5Y average6.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin–64.4%
Operating margin28.8% (better)11.4%
Net margin28.5% (better)5.0%
FCF margin22.6% (better)9.6%
Return on equity14.9% (better)9.7%
Return on invested capital16.3%23.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.06 (better)0.58
Net debt / EBITDA−1.360.33 (better)
Interest coverage104×–
Current ratio3.35 (better)0.88
Altman Z-score7.84 (better)0.86
Piotroski F-score58 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.39%–
Payout ratio8.0%–
Buyback yield2.0%–
Shareholder yield2.4% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions88.5%–
Held by insiders3.7%0.43%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$57.4M (better)−$108M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float2.2%2.4%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.