Perella Weinberg Partners vs Walker & Dunlop
PWP and WD side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PWP and WD compare
Perella Weinberg Partners and Walker & Dunlop are about the same size, with market caps of $1.4B and $1.4B.
Perella Weinberg Partners grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus 0.87% for Walker & Dunlop).
Perella Weinberg Partners keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.3% compared with −2.6% at Walker & Dunlop.
Both pay dividends: Perella Weinberg Partners yields 2.0% and Walker & Dunlop 6.9%.
Perella Weinberg Partners scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Walker & Dunlop), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PWP | WD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Share price | $13.87 | $39.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.0% | −40.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.3% | −74.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 736 | 1,466 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.7× | – |
| P/S | 1.8× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 13.5× | 0.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.4% | 114% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.38 | $87.72 |
| Margin of safety | −47.8% | 55.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.5% (better) | 0.87% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 2.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −28.0% (better) | −128% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −130% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −26.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 5.9% | – |
| Net margin | 4.3% (better) | −2.6% |
| FCF margin | 13.1% | 123% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −1.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 2.67 (better) | 0.99 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | 6.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 81.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.15% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 8.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.7% | 86.7% |
| Held by insiders | 23.4% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.2M | $990K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.2% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- PWP stock overview
- PWP income statement
- PWP valuation and score
- WD stock overview
- WD income statement
- WD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.