ProPetro vs Expro
PUMP and XPRO side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PUMP and XPRO compare
Expro is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as ProPetro ($1.5B against $881M).
ProPetro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.0% versus −7.1% for Expro).
Expro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.3% compared with 0.16% at ProPetro.
Expro scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for ProPetro), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PUMP | XPRO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $881M | $1.5B |
| Share price | $7.17 | $13.49 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.5% | −2.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −7.8% | −18.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 1,700 | 8,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 74.9× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.6× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.5× |
| FCF yield | −10.9% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.96 | $10.60 |
| Margin of safety | 28.0% (better) | −27.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.0% (better) | −7.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.0% | 18.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −70.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −71.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.9% (better) | 22.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.48% | 3.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.16% | 1.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.9% | 7.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.22% | 1.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.30% | 2.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.86 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.63 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.49 (better) | 2.05 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.38 | 1.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 4.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 120% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$278M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.0% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- PUMP stock overview
- PUMP income statement
- PUMP valuation and score
- XPRO stock overview
- XPRO income statement
- XPRO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.