Priority Technology vs QuinStreet
PRTH and QNST side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRTH and QNST compare
QuinStreet is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Priority Technology ($1.1B against $651M).
On earnings, QuinStreet is cheaper: it trades at 11.7× trailing earnings, against 16.1× for Priority Technology.
QuinStreet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 10.1% for Priority Technology).
QuinStreet scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Priority Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRTH | QNST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $651M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $7.90 | $18.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.7% | 33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.5% | 15.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 1,200 | 1,074 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.1× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× (better) | 12.7× |
| P/FCF | 6.0× (better) | 8.2× |
| FCF yield | 16.7% (better) | 12.2% |
| Fair value | $13.84 | $46.11 |
| Margin of safety | 42.9% | 58.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.1% | 29.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.7% (better) | 17.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 783% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −7.5% | 753% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.3% | 26.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.1% (better) | 12.1% |
| Operating margin | 13.2% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net margin | – | 6.6% |
| FCF margin | 10.6% (better) | 9.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 31.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.7% | 25.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.20 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.30 (better) | −0.90 |
| Interest coverage | 1.6× | 8.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.10 | 1.32 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.74 | 3.79 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.6% | 93.0% |
| Held by insiders | 59.7% | 5.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$23.8K (better) | −$17.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.0% |
Go deeper
- PRTH stock overview
- PRTH income statement
- PRTH valuation and score
- QNST stock overview
- QNST income statement
- QNST valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.