StockData

Profound Medical vs QT Imaging

PROF and QTI side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PROF and QTI compare

QT Imaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (157% versus 65.3% for Profound Medical).

QT Imaging keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −54.6% compared with −138% at Profound Medical.

Profound Medical scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for QT Imaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPROFQTI
Size and price
Market cap–$27.5M
Share price$7.42$1.88
Change, 1 year14.7%−69.5%
Change, 5 years−39.1%−98.7%
Beta (5Y)1.020.05
Employees16232
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.9×
P/B–10.4×
FCF yield–−51.3%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)65.3%157% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.1%–
EPS growth, 5Y average2.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin73.9% (better)40.2%
Operating margin−145%−24.9% (better)
Net margin−138%−54.6% (better)
FCF margin–−47.7%
Return on equity−87.0%–
Return on invested capital−213%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.11 (better)1.47
Interest coverage−105.8×–
Current ratio4.54 (better)2.78
Altman Z-score–−1.63
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−94.3%
Shareholder yield–−94.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions45.2%22.3%
Held by insiders1.6%91.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$155K
Short interest, % of float4.4%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.