United Parks & Resorts vs Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality
PRKS and PRSU side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRKS and PRSU compare
United Parks & Resorts is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality ($1.8B against $1.5B).
On earnings, United Parks & Resorts is cheaper: it trades at 15.0× trailing earnings, against 32.3× for Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality.
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.9% versus −1.9% for United Parks & Resorts).
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.6% compared with 7.6% at United Parks & Resorts.
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for United Parks & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRKS | PRSU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Share price | $40.10 | $54.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.3% | 58.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.7% | 12.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 3,300 | 2,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.0× (better) | 32.3× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | – | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× (better) | 11.7× |
| P/FCF | 12.1× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.30 |
| FCF yield | 8.3% (better) | −1.5% |
| Fair value | $62.61 | $63.17 |
| Margin of safety | 36.0% (better) | 14.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.9% | 11.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.9% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −31.4% (better) | −87.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.3% (better) | −87.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 92.6% |
| Operating margin | 18.6% | – |
| Net margin | 7.6% | 9.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.2% (better) | −4.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 7.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.21 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.59 | 0.51 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.55 | 1.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.75 | 4.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 20.0% (better) | 2.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 20.0% (better) | 2.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 134% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 63.7% | 26.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$881K | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 30.2% | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- PRKS stock overview
- PRKS income statement
- PRKS valuation and score
- PRSU stock overview
- PRSU income statement
- PRSU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.