Park National vs WSFS Financial
PRK and WSFS side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PRK and WSFS compare
WSFS Financial is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Park National ($4.1B against $3.2B).
On earnings, WSFS Financial is cheaper: it trades at 12.6× trailing earnings, against 15.5× for Park National.
Park National grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.9% versus 5.8% for WSFS Financial).
WSFS Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.8% compared with 25.7% at Park National.
Both pay dividends: Park National yields 3.2% and WSFS Financial 0.96%.
WSFS Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Park National), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PRK | WSFS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $4.1B |
| Share price | $176.51 | $80.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.3% | 46.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.1% | 48.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 1,731 | 2,335 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.5× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/S | 4.1× | 3.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.6× | 14.3× (better) |
| PEG | 2.20 | 0.94 (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.0% | 7.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $139.19 | $69.31 |
| Margin of safety | −26.8% | −15.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.9% (better) | 5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.6% | 19.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.8% | 31.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.3% | 17.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 25.7% | 29.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 24.6% | 25.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.7% | 12.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.37 (better) | 0.33 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% (better) | 0.96% |
| Payout ratio | – | 11.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 6.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 8.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% | 8.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.6% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$5.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- PRK stock overview
- PRK income statement
- PRK valuation and score
- WSFS stock overview
- WSFS income statement
- WSFS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.