ePlus vs Td Synnex
PLUS and SNX side by side, both in professional and commercial equipment and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLUS and SNX compare
Td Synnex is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as ePlus ($19.2B against $2.5B).
On earnings, Td Synnex is cheaper: it trades at 14.7× trailing earnings, against 19.4× for ePlus.
Td Synnex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.1% versus 13.1% for ePlus).
ePlus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with 1.8% at Td Synnex.
Both pay dividends: ePlus yields 1.1% and Td Synnex 0.80%.
Td Synnex scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for ePlus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLUS | SNX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $19.2B |
| Share price | $97.19 | $240.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.1% | 56.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 68.9% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 2,148 | 270K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.4× | 14.7× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.7× | 9.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 80.3× | – |
| PEG | 4.94 | 1.07 (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.2% (better) | −4.2% |
| Fair value | $86.06 | $247.87 |
| Margin of safety | −12.9% | 2.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.1% | 24.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | 25.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.0% | 71.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.3% | 78.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | −0.51% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.4% (better) | 6.9% |
| Operating margin | 7.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net margin | 5.2% (better) | 1.8% |
| FCF margin | 1.3% (better) | −1.1% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% | 14.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 18.7% (better) | 12.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.59 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.93 |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.99 (better) | 1.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.44 (better) | 2.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | 20.8% | 11.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 34.5% |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% | 2.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 3.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 92.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 0.69% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.3M (better) | −$41.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- PLUS stock overview
- PLUS income statement
- PLUS valuation and score
- SNX stock overview
- SNX income statement
- SNX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.