Palantir Technologies vs Snowflake
PLTR and SNOW side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLTR and SNOW compare
Palantir Technologies is the larger company, worth 3.9 times as much as Snowflake ($404B against $103B).
Palantir Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (87.1% versus 32.0% for Snowflake).
Palantir Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 50.3% compared with −20.1% at Snowflake.
Palantir Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Snowflake), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLTR | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $404B | $103B |
| Share price | $167.99 | $291.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −8.8% | 7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 685% | −25.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.19 | 1.65 |
| Employees | 4,429 | 2,424 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 117× | – |
| P/S | 55.4× | 18.9× (better) |
| P/B | 36.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 117× | – |
| P/FCF | 99.6× | 85.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.0% | 1.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $48.24 | – |
| Margin of safety | −248% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 87.1% (better) | 32.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.6% | 51.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 235% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 240% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 84.7% (better) | 67.0% |
| Operating margin | 45.6% (better) | −22.8% |
| Net margin | 50.3% (better) | −20.1% |
| FCF margin | 55.6% (better) | 22.0% |
| Return on equity | 41.2% (better) | −46.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 801% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −148.8× |
| Current ratio | 7.10 (better) | 0.94 |
| Altman Z-score | 119.42 (better) | 7.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.67% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.67% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.3% | 78.3% |
| Held by insiders | 7.6% | 3.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$710M (better) | −$1.3B |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- PLTR stock overview
- PLTR income statement
- PLTR valuation and score
- SNOW stock overview
- SNOW income statement
- SNOW valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs PLTR
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWV vs PLTR
- CRWV vs SNOW
- DDOG vs PLTR
- DDOG vs SNOW
- MDB vs SNOW
- NOW vs SNOW
- OCTV vs PLTR
- PLTR vs SNPS
- PLTR vs TEAM
- SNOW vs TWLO
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.