Packaging Corp of America vs Sonoco Products
PKG and SON side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PKG and SON compare
Packaging Corp of America is the larger company, worth 4.6 times as much as Sonoco Products ($22.5B against $4.9B).
Packaging Corp of America grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.0% versus 3.6% for Sonoco Products).
Packaging Corp of America keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.4% compared with −3.1% at Sonoco Products.
Both pay dividends: Packaging Corp of America yields 2.2% and Sonoco Products 3.2%.
Packaging Corp of America scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Sonoco Products), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PKG | SON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.5B | $4.9B |
| Share price | $253.01 | $49.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 26.1% | 22.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 90.1% | −18.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 17K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.2× | – |
| P/S | 2.3× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 4.7× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.6× | 12.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 32.8× | 14.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.0% | 7.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $169.40 | $42.24 |
| Margin of safety | −49.4% | −17.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.2% | 7.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −18.6% (better) | −136% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −17.9% (better) | −137% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.1% | 37.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.5% (better) | 20.2% |
| Operating margin | 11.2% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net margin | 7.4% (better) | −3.1% |
| FCF margin | 7.0% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on equity | 15.2% (better) | −7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.2% (better) | 2.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.83 (better) | 1.53 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.73 (better) | 5.63 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.87 (better) | 1.18 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.06 (better) | 1.61 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 64.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.2% (better) | 4.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.94% (better) | 0.15% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 98.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.0M | $884K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- PKG stock overview
- PKG income statement
- PKG valuation and score
- SON stock overview
- SON income statement
- SON valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.