Park Hotels & Resorts vs Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
PK and WH side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PK and WH compare
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Park Hotels & Resorts ($5.8B against $3.3B).
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.70% versus −0.16% for Park Hotels & Resorts).
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.0% compared with −6.5% at Park Hotels & Resorts.
Both pay dividends: Park Hotels & Resorts yields 6.2% and Wyndham Hotels & Resorts 2.1%.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Park Hotels & Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PK | WH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $5.8B |
| Share price | $16.17 | $79.32 |
| Change, 1 year | 50.8% | 8.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.4% | −9.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 90 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.4× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 12.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× (better) | 17.4× |
| P/FCF | 30.1× | 17.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.3% | 5.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $13.21 | $55.00 |
| Margin of safety | −22.4% (better) | −44.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.16% | 0.70% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 24.4% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −40.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −37.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 29.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.5% | 14.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.3% | 22.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.2% | 38.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.84% | 9.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 5.74 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.48 |
| Interest coverage | 0.1× | 3.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | – | 1.01 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.57 | 1.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.2% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 63.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 17.3% | 24.0% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 4.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.2% | 6.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 3.0% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $33.0K (better) | −$15.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.1% | 11.2% |
Go deeper
- PK stock overview
- PK income statement
- PK valuation and score
- WH stock overview
- WH income statement
- WH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.