StockData

Phathom Pharmaceuticals vs Rigel Pharmaceuticals

PHAT and RIGL side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PHAT and RIGL compare

Rigel Pharmaceuticals is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Phathom Pharmaceuticals ($831M against $493M).

Phathom Pharmaceuticals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (86.8% versus 2.2% for Rigel Pharmaceuticals).

Rigel Pharmaceuticals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 107% compared with −30.2% at Phathom Pharmaceuticals.

Rigel Pharmaceuticals scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Phathom Pharmaceuticals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPHATRIGL
Size and price
Market cap$493M$831M
Share price$6.06$44.46
Change, 1 year−58.5%11.3%
Change, 5 years−69.8%45.8%
Beta (5Y)1.631.08
Employees371174
StockData Score
Total score411 (better)
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score14 (better)
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–2.9×
P/S1.8× (better)2.9×
P/B–1.9×
EV/EBITDA–9.2×
FCF yield−4.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)86.8% (better)2.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–22.1%
Net income growth (TTM)–171%
EPS growth (TTM)–147%
Profitability
Gross margin80.7%89.6% (better)
Operating margin−9.3%26.3% (better)
Net margin−30.2%107% (better)
FCF margin−7.7%–
Return on equity–109%
Return on invested capital–46.4%
Financial health
Interest coverage−0.4×18.2× (better)
Current ratio1.762.39 (better)
Altman Z-score−4.834.98 (better)
Piotroski F-score47 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions88.7%87.7%
Held by insiders12.2%3.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$0 (better)−$306K
Short interest, % of float12.9%14.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.