StockData

PicoCELA vs Impinj

PCLA and PI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PCLA and PI compare

Impinj grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.7% versus −30.6% for PicoCELA).

Impinj keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.5% compared with −115% at PicoCELA.

Impinj scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for PicoCELA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPCLAPI
Size and price
Market cap–$5.2B
Share price$6.00$168.54
Change, 1 year−36.3%10.1%
Change, 5 years–106%
Beta (5Y)2.922.01
Employees55255
StockData Score
Total score16 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score13 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–13.4×
P/B–17.2×
EV/EBITDA–414×
P/FCF–79.3×
FCF yield–1.3%
Fair value–$6.39
Margin of safety–−2538%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−30.6%7.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–21.1%
Profitability
Gross margin–53.5%
Operating margin−110%−0.71% (better)
Net margin−115%−2.5% (better)
FCF margin−105%16.9% (better)
Return on equity−225%−3.8% (better)
Return on invested capital−184%−0.66% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.690.62 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–5.76
Interest coverage–−1.0×
Current ratio1.769.42 (better)
Altman Z-score–13.00
Piotroski F-score25 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.01%106%
Held by insiders–8.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$169M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float–8.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.