StockData

Powerbank vs Phoenix Asia

PBK and PHOE side by side, both in construction special trade contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PBK and PHOE compare

Phoenix Asia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.2% versus −34.0% for Powerbank).

Phoenix Asia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −16.7% compared with −88.5% at Powerbank.

Phoenix Asia scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Powerbank), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPBKPHOE
Size and price
Share price$0.135$15.79
Change, 1 year−91.6%−5.3%
Beta (5Y)–0.09
Employees1932
StockData Score
Total score35 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−34.0%−2.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−217%
EPS growth (TTM)–−200%
Profitability
Gross margin34.7% (better)4.6%
Operating margin−82.6%−16.8% (better)
Net margin−88.5%−16.7% (better)
Return on equity−124%−25.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−24.0% (better)−31.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity3.28 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−6.0× (better)−487.7×
Current ratio1.045.46 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions16.2%–
Held by insiders0.00%74.5%
Short interest, % of float–0.02%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.