StockData

Parabolic Technologies vs Super League Enterprise

PARA and SLE side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How PARA and SLE compare

Super League Enterprise is the larger company, worth 28 times as much as Parabolic Technologies ($7.2M against $255K).

Parabolic Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.6% versus −14.3% for Super League Enterprise).

Super League Enterprise keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −190% compared with −229% at Parabolic Technologies.

Parabolic Technologies pays a dividend yielding 1393%; Super League Enterprise does not pay one.

Parabolic Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Super League Enterprise), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricPARASLE
Size and price
Market cap$255K$7.2M
Share price$0.072$4.27
Change, 1 year−100.0%−69.6%
Change, 5 years−100%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)−1.071.69
Employees3334
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)5
Valuation score33
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score11
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score3 (better)0
Valuation
P/S0.0× (better)0.6×
P/B0.0× (better)0.6×
Fair value$12.37$60.37
Margin of safety99.4% (better)92.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)19.6% (better)−14.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–40.6%
Profitability
Gross margin81.2% (better)37.9%
Operating margin−178%−121% (better)
Net margin−229%−190% (better)
Return on equity−319% (better)−504%
Return on invested capital−242% (better)−1341%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−2.0×
Current ratio0.101.85 (better)
Altman Z-score−7.37 (better)−23.14
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield1393%–
Shareholder yield1393% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions98.8%4.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$602K$0 (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.