Onespaworld vs Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality
OSW and PRSU side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OSW and PRSU compare
Onespaworld is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality ($3.1B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality is cheaper: it trades at 32.3× trailing earnings, against 36.7× for Onespaworld.
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.9% versus 9.8% for Onespaworld).
Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.6% compared with 8.3% at Onespaworld.
Onespaworld pays a dividend yielding 0.65%; Pursuit Attractions & Hospitality does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OSW | PRSU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $1.5B |
| Share price | $30.80 | $54.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.3% | 58.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 179% | 12.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 5,395 | 2,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 16 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.7× | 32.3× (better) |
| P/S | 3.0× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 5.4× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.8× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 32.7× | – |
| PEG | 3.03 | 2.30 (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.1% (better) | −1.5% |
| Fair value | $21.01 | $63.17 |
| Margin of safety | −46.6% | 14.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.8% | 11.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 51.4% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.7% (better) | −87.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.3% (better) | −87.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 92.6% |
| Operating margin | 9.1% | – |
| Net margin | 8.3% | 9.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.2% (better) | −4.4% |
| Return on equity | 15.1% (better) | 7.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 0.21 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.32 (better) | 0.51 |
| Interest coverage | 18.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.22 (better) | 1.66 |
| Altman Z-score | 13.88 (better) | 4.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | – |
| Payout ratio | 23.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.9% | 2.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 2.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 3.1% | 26.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.9M | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- OSW stock overview
- OSW income statement
- OSW valuation and score
- PRSU stock overview
- PRSU income statement
- PRSU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.