Ormat Technologies vs Pampa Energy
ORA and PAM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ORA and PAM compare
Ormat Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.6% versus 6.5% for Pampa Energy).
Pampa Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.9% compared with 11.1% at Ormat Technologies.
Ormat Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.53%; Pampa Energy does not pay one.
Ormat Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Pampa Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ORA | PAM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.6B | – |
| Share price | $90.45 | $65.21 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.7% | −26.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 12.5% | 267% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 1,512 | 1,847 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.9× | – |
| P/S | 4.6× | – |
| P/B | 2.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.5× | – |
| PEG | 2.10 | – |
| FCF yield | −4.2% | – |
| Fair value | $91.38 | – |
| Margin of safety | 1.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.6% (better) | 6.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 0.79% (better) | −39.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −0.92% (better) | −39.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.4% | 31.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.7% | 25.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 18.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −19.4% | −10.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.2% | 11.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | 8.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 0.53 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.48 | 1.27 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.2× | 2.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.92 | 3.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.31 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.53% | – |
| Payout ratio | 21.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.53% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.0% | 0.38% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 30.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.2M | $19.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.5% | – |
Go deeper
- ORA stock overview
- ORA income statement
- ORA valuation and score
- PAM stock overview
- PAM income statement
- PAM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.