StockData

Onity vs UWM

ONIT and UWMC side by side, both in non-depository credit institutions. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ONIT and UWMC compare

UWM is the larger company, worth 8.9 times as much as Onity ($2.0B against $228M).

UWM grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 14.4% for Onity).

Onity keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 0.55% at UWM.

UWM pays a dividend yielding 23.6%; Onity does not pay one.

UWM scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Onity), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricONITUWMC
Size and price
Market cap$228M$2.0B
Share price$27.33$1.27
Change, 1 year−33.9%−76.8%
Change, 5 years−14.8%−80.3%
Beta (5Y)0.991.00
Employees4,3002,200
StockData Score
Total score69 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)1
Growth score11
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score04 (better)
Dividend score03 (better)
Valuation
P/E2.0×–
P/S0.2× (better)0.6×
EV/EBITDA–17.3×
PEG0.02–
FCF yield−772%−89.2% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)14.4%20.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.1% (better)−8.5%
Net income growth (TTM)273% (better)16.3%
EPS growth (TTM)296%–
Profitability
Net margin11.1% (better)0.55%
FCF margin−154%−51.3% (better)
Financial health
Altman Z-score0.120.28 (better)
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–23.6%
Payout ratio–598%
Shareholder yield0.00%23.6% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions58.9%17.1%
Held by insiders10.8%93.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$343M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float6.5%90.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.