O-I Glass vs Sonoco Products
OI and SON side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OI and SON compare
Sonoco Products is the larger company, worth 6.2 times as much as O-I Glass ($4.9B against $796M).
Sonoco Products grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.6% versus −1.9% for O-I Glass).
Sonoco Products keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.1% compared with −18.9% at O-I Glass.
Sonoco Products pays a dividend yielding 3.2%; O-I Glass does not pay one.
Sonoco Products scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for O-I Glass), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OI | SON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $796M | $4.9B |
| Share price | $5.17 | $49.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.7% | 22.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.2% | −18.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 19K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | – | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× (better) | 12.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 14.0× |
| FCF yield | −5.5% | 7.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $8.76 | $42.24 |
| Margin of safety | 41.0% (better) | −17.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.9% | 3.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | 7.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −136% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −137% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 37.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 13.2% | 20.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 2.7% |
| Net margin | −18.9% | −3.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.69% | 4.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 2.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.53 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.21 | 5.63 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.28 (better) | 1.18 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.94 | 1.61 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.2% |
| Buyback yield | 2.5% (better) | 0.15% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 98.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $279K | $884K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.9% | 11.9% |
Go deeper
- OI stock overview
- OI income statement
- OI valuation and score
- SON stock overview
- SON income statement
- SON valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.