StockData

Nuvation Bio vs Zymeworks

NUVB and ZYME side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NUVB and ZYME compare

Zymeworks is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Nuvation Bio ($2.1B against $1.5B).

Nuvation Bio grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (654% versus 97.8% for Zymeworks).

Zymeworks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.3% compared with −67.4% at Nuvation Bio.

Zymeworks scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Nuvation Bio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNUVBZYME
Size and price
Market cap$1.5B$2.1B
Share price$4.29$29.07
Change, 1 year−7.5%61.1%
Change, 5 years−52.6%46.7%
Beta (5Y)1.460.84
Employees298264
StockData Score
Total score410 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score14 (better)
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–55.9×
P/S7.5× (better)7.8×
P/B6.6× (better)8.0×
EV/EBITDA–44.4×
FCF yield–−5.5%
Fair value$2.00$12.06
Margin of safety−115% (better)−141%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)654% (better)97.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–22.2%
Profitability
Operating margin−61.2%16.6% (better)
Net margin−67.4%16.3% (better)
FCF margin–−42.4%
Return on equity−49.1%15.0% (better)
Return on invested capital–21.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.03 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−5.9×–
Current ratio7.45 (better)3.30
Altman Z-score0.170.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score46 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–8.0%
Shareholder yield0.00%8.0% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions66.5%98.1%
Held by insiders26.4%58.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.5M (better)−$5.0M
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float24.0%20.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.