StockData

Nuvation Bio vs Arcus Biosciences

NUVB and RCUS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NUVB and RCUS compare

Arcus Biosciences is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Nuvation Bio ($2.2B against $1.4B).

Nuvation Bio grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (654% versus −58.3% for Arcus Biosciences).

Nuvation Bio keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −67.4% compared with −453% at Arcus Biosciences.

Nuvation Bio scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Arcus Biosciences), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNUVBRCUS
Size and price
Market cap$1.4B$2.2B
Share price$3.99$17.43
Change, 1 year−19.1%−12.8%
Change, 5 years−55.9%−63.3%
Beta (5Y)1.451.42
Employees298601
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S6.9× (better)22.2×
P/B6.1× (better)6.2×
FCF yield–−21.0%
Fair value$1.94$5.80
Margin of safety−105% (better)−201%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)654% (better)−58.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–25.9%
Profitability
Operating margin−61.2% (better)−475%
Net margin−67.4% (better)−453%
FCF margin–−466%
Return on equity−49.1% (better)−114%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.03–
Interest coverage−5.9× (better)−43.2×
Current ratio7.45 (better)3.34
Altman Z-score0.06 (better)−1.35
Piotroski F-score4 (better)1
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−12.6%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−12.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions66.5%96.3%
Held by insiders24.6%31.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.5M (better)−$9.3M
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float23.4%15.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.