North American Construction vs ProPetro
NOA and PUMP side by side, both in oil and gas field services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NOA and PUMP compare
North American Construction grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.2% versus −6.0% for ProPetro).
North American Construction keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with 0.16% at ProPetro.
ProPetro scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for North American Construction), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NOA | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $881M |
| Share price | $9.46 | $7.17 |
| Change, 1 year | −30.8% | −32.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.3% | −7.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 900 | 1,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.7× |
| P/B | – | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.6× |
| FCF yield | – | −10.9% |
| Fair value | – | $9.96 |
| Margin of safety | – | 28.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.2% (better) | −6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.8% (better) | 10.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −23.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.6% | 23.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.5% (better) | 0.48% |
| Net margin | 2.6% (better) | 0.16% |
| FCF margin | −1.3% (better) | −7.9% |
| Return on equity | 8.0% (better) | 0.22% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% (better) | 0.30% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.99 | 0.86 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.42 | 0.63 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.9× (better) | 0.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.88 | 3.49 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 39.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 24.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.8% | 120% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$278M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 15.0% |
Go deeper
- NOA stock overview
- NOA income statement
- NOA valuation and score
- PUMP stock overview
- PUMP income statement
- PUMP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.