Net Lease Office Properties vs Alpine Income Property Trust
NLOP and PINE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NLOP and PINE compare
Alpine Income Property Trust is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Net Lease Office Properties ($302M against $141M).
On earnings, Net Lease Office Properties is cheaper: it trades at 7.7× trailing earnings, against 36.7× for Alpine Income Property Trust.
Alpine Income Property Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.9% versus −55.1% for Net Lease Office Properties).
Net Lease Office Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.8% compared with 16.5% at Alpine Income Property Trust.
Both pay dividends: Net Lease Office Properties yields 202% and Alpine Income Property Trust 7.1%.
Alpine Income Property Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Net Lease Office Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NLOP | PINE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $141M | $302M |
| Share price | $9.53 | $16.86 |
| Change, 1 year | −68.3% | 8.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −6.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.06 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 197 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.7× (better) | 36.7× |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.3× (better) | 5.3× |
| Fair value | $32.16 | $23.73 |
| Margin of safety | 70.4% (better) | 29.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −55.1% | 31.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 25.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 41.1% |
| Net margin | 34.8% (better) | 16.5% |
| Return on equity | 6.1% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 1.7× |
| Altman Z-score | 6.49 (better) | 0.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 202% (better) | 7.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 172% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 6.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 202% (better) | 7.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.2% | 59.4% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$261K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- NLOP stock overview
- NLOP income statement
- NLOP valuation and score
- PINE stock overview
- PINE income statement
- PINE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.