N-able vs SentinelOne
NABL and S side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NABL and S compare
SentinelOne is the larger company, worth 9.1 times as much as N-able ($8.3B against $905M).
SentinelOne grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.1% versus 8.3% for N-able).
N-able keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.3% compared with −31.0% at SentinelOne.
SentinelOne scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for N-able), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NABL | S |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $905M | $8.3B |
| Share price | $4.79 | $23.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.1% | 38.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −59.8% | −66.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 1.65 |
| Employees | 1,852 | 2,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 5.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 12.0× (better) | 146× |
| FCF yield | 8.4% (better) | 0.68% |
| Fair value | $9.45 | $17.03 |
| Margin of safety | 49.3% (better) | −39.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.3% | 21.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.9% | 60.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.9% (better) | 72.5% |
| Operating margin | 10.2% (better) | −29.5% |
| Net margin | −2.3% (better) | −31.0% |
| FCF margin | 14.1% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | −1.5% (better) | −23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 2.6% (better) | −34.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.51 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.01 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.11 | 1.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.51 | 4.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 82.6% |
| Held by insiders | 62.4% | 8.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$42.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 10.6% |
Go deeper
- NABL stock overview
- NABL income statement
- NABL valuation and score
- S stock overview
- S income statement
- S valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.