Marti Technologies vs Swvl
MRT and SWVL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRT and SWVL compare
Marti Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (110% versus 40.5% for Swvl).
Swvl keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.4% compared with −106% at Marti Technologies.
Marti Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Swvl), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRT | SWVL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.02 | $4.58 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.9% | 50.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.4% | −98.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.05 | 0.89 |
| Employees | – | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 110% (better) | 40.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 10.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.1% (better) | 18.0% |
| Operating margin | −72.7% | −2.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −106% | 5.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −38.9% | −8.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 29.3% |
| Return on invested capital | −288% | −44.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | −2.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.2% | – |
| Held by insiders | 58.9% | 75.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.25% | – |
Go deeper
- MRT stock overview
- MRT income statement
- MRT valuation and score
- SWVL stock overview
- SWVL income statement
- SWVL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.