Murano Global Investments vs Studio City International
MRNO and MSC side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRNO and MSC compare
Murano Global Investments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.2% versus 8.7% for Studio City International).
Studio City International scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Murano Global Investments), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRNO | MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.185 | $0.957 |
| Change, 1 year | −92.5% | −74.3% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −86.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.02 |
| Employees | 1,016 | 5,286 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 56.2% (better) | 8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 69.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 10.1% |
| Net margin | – | −8.5% |
| Return on equity | – | −10.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 3.86 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.11 | 6.79 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.26 | 0.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 5.2% |
| Held by insiders | 86.7% | 55.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $229K |
Go deeper
- MRNO stock overview
- MRNO income statement
- MRNO valuation and score
- MSC stock overview
- MSC income statement
- MSC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.