Monolithic Power Systems vs RLX Technology
MPWR and RLX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MPWR and RLX compare
RLX Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.0% versus 28.7% for Monolithic Power Systems).
Monolithic Power Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.5% compared with 23.3% at RLX Technology.
Monolithic Power Systems pays a dividend yielding 0.54%; RLX Technology does not pay one.
Monolithic Power Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for RLX Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MPWR | RLX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $68.3B | – |
| Share price | $1390.54 | $1.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.1% | −34.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 144% | −65.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.89 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 4,501 | 897 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 84.9× | – |
| P/S | 20.9× | – |
| P/B | 17.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 66.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 117× | – |
| PEG | 6.84 | – |
| FCF yield | 0.86% | – |
| Fair value | $692.84 | – |
| Margin of safety | −101% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.7% | 44.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.0% (better) | 0.72% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −52.0% | 67.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −52.5% | 63.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% (better) | 29.9% |
| Operating margin | 28.7% (better) | 8.3% |
| Net margin | 24.5% (better) | 23.3% |
| FCF margin | 17.9% | 24.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.6% (better) | 5.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 33.7% (better) | 3.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −23.14 |
| Interest coverage | – | 51.4× |
| Current ratio | 4.98 | 5.70 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 54.57 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | – |
| Payout ratio | 41.1% | 9.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 25.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.54% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.9% | 17.2% |
| Held by insiders | 3.6% | 66.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$579M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | – |
Go deeper
- MPWR stock overview
- MPWR income statement
- MPWR valuation and score
- RLX stock overview
- RLX income statement
- RLX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.