Mid Penn Bancorp vs Univest Financial
MPB and UVSP side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MPB and UVSP compare
Univest Financial is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Mid Penn Bancorp ($1.1B against $885M).
On earnings, Univest Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.8× trailing earnings, against 12.1× for Mid Penn Bancorp.
Mid Penn Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.3% versus 9.4% for Univest Financial).
Univest Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.0% compared with 25.8% at Mid Penn Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Mid Penn Bancorp yields 2.7% and Univest Financial 2.2%.
Univest Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 13 for Mid Penn Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MPB | UVSP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $885M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $34.94 | $40.85 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.7% | 33.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 18.2% | 39.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 16 | 960 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× | 11.8× (better) |
| P/S | 3.2× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/FCF | 13.9× | 10.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.02 |
| FCF yield | 7.2% | 9.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $34.58 | $39.11 |
| Margin of safety | −1.0% (better) | −4.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 31.3% (better) | 9.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 42.8% (better) | 23.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.0% | 26.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −3.8% | 14.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 25.8% | 29.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 23.0% | 31.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.4% | 10.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 | 0.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.17 | 0.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% (better) | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | 31.9% | 25.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.48% | 7.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 6.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.4% | 83.9% |
| Held by insiders | 25.6% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $332K (better) | −$2.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- MPB stock overview
- MPB income statement
- MPB valuation and score
- UVSP stock overview
- UVSP income statement
- UVSP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.