Mid Penn Bancorp vs Tompkins Financial
MPB and TMP side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MPB and TMP compare
Tompkins Financial is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Mid Penn Bancorp ($1.4B against $885M).
On earnings, Tompkins Financial is cheaper: it trades at 8.0× trailing earnings, against 12.1× for Mid Penn Bancorp.
Tompkins Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (117% versus 31.3% for Mid Penn Bancorp).
Tompkins Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 39.6% compared with 25.8% at Mid Penn Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Mid Penn Bancorp yields 2.7% and Tompkins Financial 2.0%.
Tompkins Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for Mid Penn Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MPB | TMP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $885M | $1.4B |
| Share price | $34.94 | $100.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.7% | 48.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 18.2% | 21.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 16 | 870 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× | 8.0× (better) |
| P/S | 3.2× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 13.9× (better) | 28.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.33 |
| FCF yield | 7.2% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $34.58 | – |
| Margin of safety | −1.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 31.3% | 117% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 2.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 42.8% | 113% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.0% | 113% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −3.8% | 16.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 25.8% | 39.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 23.0% (better) | 10.9% |
| Return on equity | 8.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.17 | 0.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% (better) | 2.0% |
| Payout ratio | 31.9% | 21.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.48% | 8.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.43% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% (better) | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.4% | 70.7% |
| Held by insiders | 25.6% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $332K (better) | $100K |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- MPB stock overview
- MPB income statement
- MPB valuation and score
- TMP stock overview
- TMP income statement
- TMP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.