Mount Logan Capital vs Silvercrest Asset Management
MLCI and SAMG side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MLCI and SAMG compare
Silvercrest Asset Management is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as Mount Logan Capital ($133M against $39.0M).
Silvercrest Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.2% versus −24.3% for Mount Logan Capital).
Silvercrest Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.74% compared with −155% at Mount Logan Capital.
Both pay dividends: Mount Logan Capital yields 3.4% and Silvercrest Asset Management 7.5%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MLCI | SAMG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $39.0M | $133M |
| Share price | $3.48 | $11.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −56.1% | −20.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.1% | −31.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.35 | 0.89 |
| Employees | – | 171 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 93.5× |
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 23.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 4.2% |
| Fair value | $15.41 | $9.64 |
| Margin of safety | 77.4% (better) | −16.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −24.3% | 1.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 3.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −85.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −83.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −11.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 2.5% |
| Net margin | −155% | 0.74% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 4.4% |
| Return on equity | −79.0% | 1.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 4.9× |
| Altman Z-score | −0.08 | 2.45 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% | 7.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 696% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 43.3% (better) | 6.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 46.8% (better) | 14.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 22.4% | 39.2% |
| Held by insiders | 8.5% | 15.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $43.5K | $719K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- MLCI stock overview
- MLCI income statement
- MLCI valuation and score
- SAMG stock overview
- SAMG income statement
- SAMG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.