MGE Energy vs Unitil
MGEE and UTL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MGEE and UTL compare
MGE Energy is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Unitil ($3.0B against $1.0B).
On earnings, Unitil is cheaper: it trades at 18.1× trailing earnings, against 19.4× for MGE Energy.
Unitil grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.1% versus 7.1% for MGE Energy).
MGE Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.5% compared with 9.1% at Unitil.
Both pay dividends: MGE Energy yields 2.5% and Unitil 2.6%.
MGE Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Unitil), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MGEE | UTL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $1.0B |
| Share price | $78.76 | $55.76 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.3% | 15.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.7% | 35.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 0.25 |
| Employees | 726 | 595 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.4× | 18.1× (better) |
| P/S | 3.9× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.0× | 17.7× (better) |
| PEG | 2.93 (better) | 3.88 |
| FCF yield | −5.5% | −3.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $78.37 | $52.32 |
| Margin of safety | −0.49% (better) | −6.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% | 21.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.7% (better) | 5.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.2% | 18.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.1% (better) | 6.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.4% (better) | 6.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 22.0% (better) | 18.6% |
| Net margin | 19.5% (better) | 9.1% |
| FCF margin | −21.4% | −6.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.0% (better) | 9.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.1% (better) | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.65 (better) | 1.54 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.42 (better) | 8.66 |
| Current ratio | 1.14 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.37 (better) | 0.82 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 2.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 46.8% | 61.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.0% (better) | 3.7% |
| Buyback yield | −3.0% | −1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.53% | 0.81% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.1% | 84.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.43% | 0.71% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $92.7K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- MGEE stock overview
- MGEE income statement
- MGEE valuation and score
- UTL stock overview
- UTL income statement
- UTL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.